Buehl Chapters 3
&4
I think Buehl brings up some really great points about
reading assignments and students. He
writes, “We tend to think of comprehension as the understanding of what an
author tells us, but it is the implicit part -what is not on the page- that
matters most” (Pg. 74). I never really
thought about how much background knowledge and experiences go into reading
assignments. The knowledge gap is a huge
issue; especially with such dense science textbooks we all know and love. That being said, I really enjoyed chapter 4
and the idea of frontloading instruction and building knowledge for reading,
not through reading. Having students
draw from their own previous knowledge and then re-examining that knowledge is
a great way to see where the class is as a whole with the concept prior to much
reading. Buehl brings up great examples
of frontloading with much knowledge, frontloading with diverse knowledge, and
frontloading with insufficient knowledge.
For me, what I enjoyed most about this reading was how
applicable it is to my future classroom.
I can absolutely see myself using some of these frontloading strategies
in an effort to not only draw out prior knowledge and promote priming for new
knowledge, but also to help bridge the knowledge gap with textbook readings
that can be intimidating. I like a lot of
the strategies presented, especially ones that leave room for predictions,
hypotheses, inquiry, discussion, and revision.
These types of strategies would fit nicely into a modeling approach. Earlier, I bashed Buehl for writing to much
about himself (what he is good and bad at), family, and things he likes to do
and not do, but after reading these sections it’s pretty clear he knows what’s
up.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.